Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help using our Wiki
Stationery Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Log in
Personal tools
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
The Pen Addict 416/transcript
(section)
Page
Discussion
British English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
Refresh
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Format and Paper Discussion == '''Brad Dowdy:''' So I, here's my, it's not a complaint. It's a, it's an idea. I don't think they went outside the comfort zone enough. I think if you're going to build this edition and call it the heavy duty edition, it has to have Yupo paper in it. This is tailor made for Yupo paper as much as people might hate it. '''Myke Hurley:''' That might be, I get what you're saying, but I feel like the Yupo paper is, is too much. '''Brad Dowdy:''' They obviously agree with you, but that's what this edition needs. It needs to be the nuclear strength post-it note that we see that's indestructible, right? If you're going to say, this is my heavy duty notebook, don't give me destructible paper in it. I would have, I would have loved to see it and it would have been a nightmare for them. They would have gotten, people would have crushed them for it. I think it would have been the right decision for this edition to, to do a Yupo paper for what they're, what they're positioning this notebook as. Just a thought I had, like, I understand what you're saying. Because I ran down to the specs to see if it contained waterproof paper and it didn't. It was just standard paper, which is great. I mean, but I would, my initial thought was, oh, cool. This is going to have some type of protected paper in it because of how they're positioning it. And it's just, it's regular paper. '''Brad Dowdy:''' So there you go. That was just a, just, that was immediately what ran through my head when I saw this one. Yeah. I understand what you're saying, '''Myke Hurley:''' but I don't agree. I just think like, yeah, there are many, there can be many interpretations of heavy duty. I don't think that, I know. It also needs to include an inferior paper for most use cases. '''Brad Dowdy:''' Yeah. It's at least a 70 pound paper, which is thicker than the 60 that they normally use. So this is a, this is a me product. Like I, I like this edition. '''Myke Hurley:''' Yeah. '''Brad Dowdy:''' Are you going to get it? '''Brad Dowdy:''' I don't know. I'm not using pocket size notebooks. I can't tell you the last time I've used a pocket size notebook. And that's essentially what this is, right? If I want this as a desk notebook, it's too small, right? If I'm doing this, I'm using an a five top bound steno. So it, it would, it's essentially just a pocket notebook. Like I, the only reason I would get it is to get it, not to use it. So that's usually the decision right there that I don't get it.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Stationery Wiki are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (see
Stationery Wiki:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)